Sir John Armitt, Chair of the National Infrastructure Commission, has reinforced the need for long-term infrastructure planning alongside short term stimulus measures to help build confidence in the economy, in a letter to the Chancellor.
His letter, sent last week, acknowledges that measures are available to stimulate demand in parts of the economy – such as accelerating the national rollout of gigabit broadband and work to make homes more energy efficient – but stresses that government must also focus on opportunities to strengthen confidence in the economy over the long term.
Armitt suggests that the right policy decisions would help address regional inequalities and achieve the net zero greenhouse gas emissions target.
He stresses that government policy and the regulatory environment, rather than simply public spending, can help generate confidence among industry and private investors to help deliver these objectives.
He also notes that setting up the UK’s first national infrastructure bank – part of a domestic replacement for the European Investment Bank – could play a key role in supporting longer term projects.
In his letter, Sir John suggests a number of immediate priorities and longer term measures for achieving a lower carbon future economy and reducing regional inequalities:
- Bringing forward energy efficiency retrofitting, gigabit broadband rollout and further R&D investment to accelerate decarbonisation of our energy sources
- Expanding the current ‘Contracts for Difference’ scheme, which encourages private investment in renewable energy projects, to grow the UK’s wind and solar power generating capacity more quickly
- Further devolution and investment to major cities to develop green urban public transport schemes, noting that changes to working patterns post-pandemic will not necessarily mean less urban journeys overall
- Improving the connectivity of regional clusters of towns and cities outside the south east of England to improve economic opportunities – in particular by boosting the transport links between them.
Sir John notes that many of these themes were explored in the Commission’s National Infrastructure Assessment, published in July 2018. The government has committed to respond to the Assessment formally with a National Infrastructure Strategy later this year.
The full text of Sir John’s letter can be found below.
12 May 2020
I trust this finds you well, amid such challenging times. I write to reiterate the Commission’s ongoing support through providing independent advice, as you embark on the next phase of addressing the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic.
The Commission remains committed to ensuring our advice to government addresses three key priorities: (i) long-term productivity and competitiveness; (ii) levelling up regional inequalities; and (iii) achieving net zero by 2050 or before. Many of the recommendations in our National Infrastructure Assessment sit at the intersection of these three goals, which we judge to be mutually reinforcing rather than in conflict.
As you will be aware, we are already planning to publish detailed studies over the coming months on how infrastructure systems might be better prepared for shocks – using an evidence base that of course predates the current crisis – and our analysis of the future rail needs of the north and Midlands, to inform the government’s integrated rail plan.
I trust these will be useful contributions for post-pandemic planning and that, as with all Commission studies, you will consider our recommendations carefully.
As you and Cabinet colleagues begin to look to the future, the Commission thought it would helpful to offer some wider reflections on the role of infrastructure in contributing to the economic recovery.
Short-term steps and long-term goals
In the short-term, the Commission would support stimulus measures that accelerate planned work (such as road maintenance) and focus on ways of locking in a lower carbon economy, through energy efficiency measures, gigabit broadband roll-out and further investment in decarbonising our energy sources. The government’s recent announcements on additional funding to make cycling and walking safer and more attractive options for regular travel are also a positive step.
At the same time, it is crucial not to lose sight of the long term. The economy runs on confidence, and government has a critical role to play in instilling this among investors, businesses and consumers.
Confidence can be won, and crucially private investment can be unlocked, by government setting out a long-term infrastructure strategy and continuing with front-end planning for longer-term schemes – even if any construction work may be some years away.
We believe our recommendations in the National Infrastructure Assessment provide a blueprint for solid investment in meeting the biggest infrastructure challenges. We have recently undertaken work to provide assurance that our headline recommendations are consistent with the statutory Net Zero goal.
Public and private investment
While significant public investment will be necessary, private capital is critical to infrastructure in many sectors. Clear guidance on the direction of policy and regulation, supported appropriately with public money for R&D and pilot projects, will stimulate private infrastructure investment. A domestic replacement for the European Investment Bank, with an explicit focus on infrastructure, could also play a major financing role and crowd-in private capital.
With these themes in mind, there are specific areas where the Commission would support early action.
Building a strong pipeline of Contract for Difference auctions – to bring forward offshore, onshore and solar power generating capacity – is the first. Government policy has shifted positively in this area, but industry needs clarity on dates and scale. Given the investment comes from the private sector and progress here would support net zero, this strikes us as a potential ‘quick win’. More broadly, and most importantly, government policy on energy should incentivise private investment – particularly in the development of new power and heating technologies such as hydrogen with carbon capture and storage.
Similarly, the Commission encourages the adoption of national standards of flood resilience to maximise the effectiveness of committed public expenditure (including the recent and welcome additional boost you announced in March’s Budget) and ensure preparedness for future events.
We would encourage you to continue with your stated agenda to give the leaders of our larger cities the funding and freedom they need to start work on their local infrastructure priorities, which would not only provide regional stimulus but help meet the needs of their growing populations over the longer term. While the impact of Covid-19 on future behaviour is uncertain, I would urge caution over speculation about a flight from the cities post-pandemic, which runs contrary to long-term trends in the attractiveness and resilience of cities. Urban public transport investment – and particularly starting to plan now for the transformative new projects – remains key to supporting future economic growth and levelling up the country.
More broadly, there is a need to boost the connectivity of towns and cities outside the south east of England, to reduce regional inequalities. I know this is a key objective of the government, and that much work – including planning an integrated rail plan for the North and Midlands – is underway. The current crisis is only likely to sharpen economic disadvantage in long struggling communities, and upgrading transport and broadband connections (alongside skills) has the potential to improve economic opportunities.
The Commission stands ready to offer advice to government on infrastructure’s role in the economic recovery. My team are available to discuss any aspects of our recommendations or further specific studies with your officials. We also continue to encourage the formulation of the National Infrastructure Strategy as part of your wider recovery plans.
Sir John Armitt